Parsley, et al v. Ditech Financial LLC, et al
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court agrees with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and ADOPT the F&R 50 as my own opinion. Ditech's Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint 28 is DENIED Signed on 7/5/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
JAMES H. PARSLEY and MARIE E.
OPINION AND ORDER
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al.,
On April 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued her Findings and
Recommendation (“F&R”) , recommending that Defendant Ditech’s Motion for Summary
Judgment  should be GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint  should be
DENIED. No objections to the F&R were filed.
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge,
but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to
make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or
recommendations as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the
1 – OPINION AND ORDER
court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal
conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are
addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny with which I am required to review
the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to
accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman’s recommendation and ADOPT the F&R
 as my own opinion. Ditech’s Motion for Summary Judgment  is GRANTED, and
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint  is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
day of July, 2017.
/s/ Michael W. Mosman_________
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN
Chief United States District Judge
2 – OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?