Morasch Meats, Inc. v. Frevol HPP, LLC et al
Filing
26
ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 15 . The Court Denies Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 12 and Denies Defendants' alternative Motion for a More Definite Statement 12 . Signed on 6/15/16 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MORASCH MEATS, INC.,
an Oregon corporation,
3:16-CV-00269-PK
ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
FREVOL HPP, LLC fka FRESHER
EVOLUTION HPP, L.L.C., a
Michigan limited liability
company, dba NEXT HPP;
ALL NATURAL FRESHNESS, L.L.C.,
a Michigan limited liability
company; ALL NATURAL FRESHNESS,
INC., a Michigan corporation;
GERALD R. LUDWICK, an individual;
and PAIGE M. RAIFSNIDER LUDWICK,
an individual,
Defendants.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#15) on May 5, 2016, in which he recommends this
1 - ORDER
Court deny Defendants’ Motion (#12) to Dismiss and deny
Defendants’ Alternative Motion (#12) for a More Definite
Statement.
The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).
See Dawson v. Marshall,
See also United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and
Recommendation (#15).
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’
Motion (#12) to Dismiss and DENIES Defendants’ Alternative Motion
(#12) for a More Definite Statement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 15th day of June, 2016.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?