Morasch Meats, Inc. v. Frevol HPP, LLC et al
Filing
79
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation 77 . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion 47 to Dismiss Defendant Paige M. Raifsnider Ludwick and DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Raifsnider Ludwick for lack of personal jurisdiction. (See attached 2-page Order). Signed on 2/9/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (pg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MORASCH MEATS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
3:16-CV-00269-PK
ORDER
v.
FREVOL HPP, LLC, fka
FRESHER EVOLUTION HPP,
L.L.C., et al.,
Defendants.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#77) on January 18, 2017, in which he recommends
this Court grant the Motion (#47) to Dismiss of Defendant Paige
M. Raifsnider Ludwick and dismiss Plaintiff's claims against her
without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction.
The matter
is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) (1) (B) and
1 - ORDER
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).
Reyna-Tapia,
See Dawson v. Marshall,
See also United States v.
328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and
Recommendation (#77).
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion
(#47) to Dismiss of Defendant Paige M. Raifsnider Ludwick and
DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant
Raifsnider Ludwick for lack of personal jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 9th day of February, 2017.
ANN~
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?