Morasch Meats, Inc. v. Frevol HPP, LLC et al

Filing 79

ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation 77 . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion 47 to Dismiss Defendant Paige M. Raifsnider Ludwick and DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Raifsnider Ludwick for lack of personal jurisdiction. (See attached 2-page Order). Signed on 2/9/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (pg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MORASCH MEATS, INC., Plaintiff, 3:16-CV-00269-PK ORDER v. FREVOL HPP, LLC, fka FRESHER EVOLUTION HPP, L.L.C., et al., Defendants. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#77) on January 18, 2017, in which he recommends this Court grant the Motion (#47) to Dismiss of Defendant Paige M. Raifsnider Ludwick and dismiss Plaintiff's claims against her without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) (1) (B) and 1 - ORDER Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). Reyna-Tapia, See Dawson v. Marshall, See also United States v. 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#77). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion (#47) to Dismiss of Defendant Paige M. Raifsnider Ludwick and DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Raifsnider Ludwick for lack of personal jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 9th day of February, 2017. ANN~ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?