Doe v. Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon et al
Opinion and Order - The Motion to Approve the Settlement of Plaintiff's Claims Against Defendant's and Authorize Payment in the Amount of $300,000 from the Future Claims Trust (ECF 22 ) is GRANTED. Signed on 7/6/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
JOHN VI DOE,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00335-YY
THE ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND IN
OREGON, an Oregon corporation; THE
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF
PORTLAND IN OREGON AND
SUCCESSORS, and a corporation sole,
d.b.a., THE ARCHDIOCESE OF
PORTLAND IN OREGON,
SIMON, District Judge:
On February 23, 2016, Plaintiff John VI Doe ("Plaintiff'), an individual proceeding
under a pseudonym, brought this action for sexual battery of a child under a respondeat superior
theory of liability against the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon and the Roman Catholic
Archbishop of Portland in Oregon and Successors, d.b.a., the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon
("Defendants"). Complaint, ECF # 1.
This court has jurisdiction over Plaintiffs action under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and Sections
6.4, 6.5, and 11.8 of the "Third Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Reorganization of Debtor,
1 - OPINION AND ORDER
Tort Claimants Committee, Future Claimants Representative, and Parish and Parishioners
Committee" (dated April 9, 2007) in the matter of Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in
Oregon, an Oregon corporation; The Roman Catholic Archbishop ofPortland in Oregon and
Successors, and a corporation sole, db.a., The Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 04-37154-ELPl 1 (2007) ("the Plan").
Before the court is Defendants' unopposed motion to approve settlement of 'future
claims' and to approve payment from the Future Claims Trust (ECF #22). For the reasons set
forth below, Defendants' motion is granted and the settlement is approved.
This court has the exclusive jurisdiction over what the Plan defines as "Future Claims"
and the Future Claims Trust, pursuant to Sections 6.4.3 and 6.5.10 of the Plan. ECF #22-1, Ex.
A, at 3, 9. The Plan also grants this court exclusive jurisdiction to approve payment of
settlements of claimants, which is necessary for payment of a claim out of the Future Claims
Trust. ECF #22-1, Ex. C, at 16, 17.
Section 11.8 of the Plan requires that notice of any motion to approve a settlement subject
to the Future Claims Trust be served upon the court, on the Reorganized Debtor, all Tort
Claimants having filed Claims or a lawsuit asserting a Claim (or having given written notice to
the Reorganized Debtor in the case of Future Claims) whose Claims have not been paid in full,
the Future Claimants Representative, the Known Tort Claims Trustee, and the Future Claims
Trustee. See ECF #22, at 3, 4. Section 11 .8 also provides that all notices shall provide the
recipients at least 20 days (plus 3 days if served by mail) in which to file an objection to the
application, motion, or other request. Id. If no objection is timely filed, the court may authorize
the proposed action without further notice or a hearing. Id.
2 - OPINION AND ORDER
On April 6, 2017, the parties met with a mediator where they agreed to settle the
Plaintiffs claim. ECF #22, at 2. The proposed settlement requires payment from the Future
Claims Trust to plaintiff in the amount of $300,000. Id. On May 15, 2017, defendants served
the required notice on all necessary parties. Notice of Filing, ECF #22-2, Ex. E. The period for
filing an objection to the parties ' proposed settlement expired on June 8, 2017. No objections
In the absence of objection by any interested party, and in consideration of the size of the
proposed payment at issue relative to the amount remaining in the Future Claims Trust, the court
finds no reason exists to deny approval of the parties' proposed settlement.
For the reasons set forth above, the motion (ECF #22) to approve the settlement of
Plaintiffs claims against the Defendants and authorize payment in the amount of $300,000 from
the Future Claims Trust is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6'rayof July, 2017.
Michael H. Simon
United States District Judge
3 - OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?