Garcia v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Filing
49
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation 47 . Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment 33 is granted. Signed on 9/13/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
RAUL GARCIA,
No. 3:16-cv-00390-SB
Plaintiff,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
a Delaware Corporation,
ORDER
Defendant.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#47) on July 27,
2017, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant Union Pacific Railroad
Company's motion for summary judgment. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840
F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's
1 - ORDER
report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find
no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings & Recommendation [47].
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [33] is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
, 2017.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?