Garcia v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Filing 49

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation 47 . Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment 33 is granted. Signed on 9/13/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RAUL GARCIA, No. 3:16-cv-00390-SB Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, ORDER Defendant. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#47) on July 27, 2017, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's motion for summary judgment. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's 1 - ORDER report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings & Recommendation [47]. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [33] is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of , 2017. MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?