Namu Inc. v. Namu Haight LLC et al
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 41 . Signed on 1/5/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (br4)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
NAMU INC., an Oregon
Corporation, dba NAMU KOREAN
AND HAWAIIAN, and NAMU KILLER
NAMU HAIGHT, LLC., a
Californian Limited Liability
Company, and DAVID LEE, an
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#41) on December 2, 2016, in which he recommends
this Court grant Defendants’ Motion (#18) to Dismiss for Lack of
Jurisdiction, grant Plaintiff’s Request (#32) for Judicial
Notice, and dismiss this matter without prejudice.
The matter is
now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and
1 - ORDER
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).
See Dawson v. Marshall,
See also United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’
Motion (#18) to Dismiss, GRANTS Plaintiff’s Request (#32) for
Judicial Notice, and DISMISSES this matter without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 5th day of January, 2017.
s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?