Namu Inc. v. Namu Haight LLC et al

Filing 43

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 41 . Signed on 1/5/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (br4)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON NAMU INC., an Oregon Corporation, dba NAMU KOREAN AND HAWAIIAN, and NAMU KILLER KOREAN BBQ, 3:16-CV-00453-PK ORDER Plaintiff, v. NAMU HAIGHT, LLC., a Californian Limited Liability Company, and DAVID LEE, an individual, Defendants. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#41) on December 2, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants’ Motion (#18) to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, grant Plaintiff’s Request (#32) for Judicial Notice, and dismiss this matter without prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 1 - ORDER Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See Dawson v. Marshall, See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and Recommendation (#41). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion (#18) to Dismiss, GRANTS Plaintiff’s Request (#32) for Judicial Notice, and DISMISSES this matter without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 5th day of January, 2017. s/ Anna J. Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?