Ciuffitelli et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP et al

Filing 670

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 665 and finds Lake Avenue is the appropriate party to receive Northern Lights' pro-rata distribution from the Settlements. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 16, 2021 by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pjg) Modified filed date on 2/18/2021 (pjg).

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-00580-AC Document 670 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON LAWRENCE P. CIUFFITELLI, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 3:16-cv-00580-AC ORDER v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, et al., Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation on January 25, 2021, in which he recommends that the Court enter an Order determining Lake Avenue is the appropriate party to receive Northern Lights’ pro-rata distribution from the Settlements. F&R, ECF 665. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 - ORDER Case 3:16-cv-00580-AC Document 670 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2 Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [665] and finds Lake Avenue is the appropriate party to receive Northern Lights’ pro-rata distribution from the Settlements. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: __________________________. February 16, 2021 MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?