Preuitt v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al

Filing 31

ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 29 . The Court Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 22 and Dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's Sixth and Seventh Claims. Signed on 8/15/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

KELLY NATHAN PREUITT,
Plaintiff,

3:16-cv-00835-PK
ORDER

v.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, an agency
of the State of Oregon;
COLETTE PETERS, individually;
STEVE SHELTON, M.D.,
individually; HEIDI STEWARD,
individually; JOHN DOES 1-10,
individually,
Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#29) on July 21, 2017, in which he recommends
this Court grant Defendants’ Motion (#22) for Summary Judgment as
to Plaintiff’s Sixth and Seventh Claims; dismiss Plaintiff’s
Sixth and Seventh Claims with prejudice; and, in light of the
fact that all of Plaintiff’s claims have now been dismissed,
dismiss this matter in its entirety.

The matter is now before

this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).

See Dawson v. Marshall,

See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.

CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and
Recommendation (#22).

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’

Motion (#22) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES with prejudice
Plaintiff’s Sixth and Seventh Claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 15th day of August, 2017.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States Senior District Judge

2 - ORDER