Reyes v. United States of America
OPINION and ORDER - Upon review, I agree with Judge Acostas recommendation and ADOPT the F&R 31 as my own opinion. Accordingly, I DENY Defendants Motion to Dismiss 14 . IT IS SO ORDERED - DATED this 11th day of May, 2017, by Chief United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman. (peg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
YOLANI A. REYES, personal representative
for the estate of Saul Guzman-Arias,
OPINION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
On March 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued his Findings and
Recommendation (“F&R”) , recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss  should
be DENIED. No objections to the F&R were filed.
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge,
but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to
make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or
recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court
is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of
1 – OPINION AND ORDER
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121
(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R
depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject,
or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta’s recommendation and ADOPT the F&R  as
my own opinion. Accordingly, I DENY Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss .
IT IS SO ORDERED.
day of May, 2017.
/s/ Michael W. Mosman_________
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN
Chief United States District Judge
2 – OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?