Moye v. Esco Corporation Workers Compensation Board
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks Findings & Recommendation 35 . The Court grants Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 8 , denies Defendants Motion to Dismiss 25 as moot, and denies Defendants request for sanctions. Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 1/12/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (joha)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
BRANDON MOYE, SR.,
ESCO CORPORATION, an
Oregon Corporation; and WORKERS
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation  on November 17,
2016, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
, deny Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss  as moot, and deny Defendant’s request for
sanctions. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation.
ECF 40. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings &
Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes there is no basis to
modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court also reviewed the pertinent portions of the
record de novo and finds no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks’ Findings & Recommendation . The
Court grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment , denies Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss  as moot, and denies Defendant’s request for sanctions. Accordingly, this case is
dismissed with prejudice.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this ________________ day of _________________________________ , 2016. 7
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
As Judge Jelderks noted, while Plaintiff names “Workers Compensation Board” in the caption of the
case, ESCO is the only defendant listed in the Complaint itself. Plaintiff does not object to Judge
Jelderks’ determination that granting summary judgment to ESCO disposes of this case.
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?