Ekas v. Affinity Property Management, LLC

Filing 53

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation 48 . Therefore, Defendant's motion for summary judgment 31 is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/2/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pvh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
ROBERT EKAS, in pro per,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

AFFINITY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC,
an Oregon corporation, and DOES 1–10
Defendants.

Robert Ekas
1312 S.W. 10th Ave., Apt. 507
Portland, Oregon 97201
Pro Se
William J. Edgar
GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A.
1211 S.W. 5th Ave., Suite 2850
Portland, Oregon 97204
Attorney for Defendant

1 - ORDER

No. 3:16-cv-1636-YY

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) [48]
on December 7, 2017, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment [31]. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the F&R. The matter is now before
the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and conclude that the objections
do not provide a basis to modify the recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent
portions of the record de novo and find no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [48].
Therefore, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [31] is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this

day of ____________________, 2018.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER