Hudson Insurance Company v. Roman Motors LLC et al
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings & Recommendation 69 , and therefore, Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees 66 is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 5/9/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (ecp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY,
ROMAN MOTORS LLC, an Oregon
limited liability company; DAMON
SLOAN, an individual; BRANDON
SLOAN, an individual; TWINSTAR
CREDIT UNION, a Washington
corporation; CROSS POINT NW LLC,
an Oregon limited liability company;
CREDIT UNION, an Oregon corporation;
CORPORATION, a Texas corporation;
MANHEIM REMARKETING, INC.
abn MANHEIM PORTLAND, a Delaware
corporation; ASHLEY MCCALPIN, an
individual; ADESA OREGON, LLC abn
ADESA PORTLAND, an Oregon limited
liability company, and MARCUS
BOLIVAR, an individual,
1 – ORDER
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation  on April 10, 2017, in
which she recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees . The
matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings & Recommendation , and
therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees  is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this ___________________ day of _________________________, 2017.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?