Lowe v. Lane County Sheriff's Office et al
Filing
119
Opinion and Order: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai's finding and recommendation is adopted in full. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, 71 , is granted, Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment, 99 and 106 , are denied, and this action is dismissed. Because any appeal of this disposition would be frivolous and not taken in good faith, Plaintiffs IFP status is revoked. Signed on 6/14/2019 by Judge Michael J. McShane.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 6/14/2019.) (cp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DIVISION
RAYMOND LESLIE LOWE, JR.,
Case No. 3:16-cv-01846-MK
Plaintiff,
v.
OPINION AND ORDER
LANE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________
MCSHANE, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings & Recommendation (“F&R”), ECF
No. 117, and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b). Although Plaintiff filed no objections, I have reviewed the legal principles de novo. See
United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude that
the F&R is correct. Judge Kasubhai’s F&R is adopted in full. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 71, is GRANTED, Plaintiff’s Motions for Summary Judgment,
ECF Nos. 99 and 106, are DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. Because any appeal of this
disposition would be frivolous and not taken in good faith, Plaintiff’s IFP status is revoked.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 14th day of June, 2019.
/s/ Michael McShane________
Michael J. McShane
United States District Judge
Page 1 – OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?