Domion et al v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.
OPINION AND ORDER. I DENY Defendant TriQuint Semiconductor Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of its Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations 52 . Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 45 as my own opinion. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 36 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/13/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PEDRO DOMION, ASHLEY DOMION,
AND ASHLEY DOMION AS
GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR
NICHOLAS DOMION, a minor,
OPINION AND ORDER
TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., a
On November 2, 2017, Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman issued her Findings and
Recommendation (F&R) , recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss  should be
denied. Defendant TriQuint Semiconductor filed Objections  and Plaintiffs responded . I
DENY Defendant TriQuint Semiconductor Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of its
Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations .
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge,
1 – OPINION AND ORDER
but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to
make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or
recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court
is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121
(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R
depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject,
or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R
 as my own opinion. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss  is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this ____ day of February, 2018.
/s/ Michael W. Mosman
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN
Chief United States District Judge
2 – OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?