Richmond v. Chrysler Group LLC, et al

Filing 36

ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 34 . Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 23 is Granted and this case is Dismissed. Signed on 5/4/18 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

BETH RICHMOND,

No. 3:16-cv-1936-PK
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.

CHRYSLER GROUP LLC and JAKE
SWEENEY CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE
INC.,
Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) [34] on
March 27, 2018, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant Chrysler Group LLC’s
(“FCA”)1 Motion for Summary Judgment [23].
Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s F&R, the Court
is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d
1

The entity that Plaintiff identifies as “Chrysler Group LLC” is properly denominated as “FCA US LLC.”

1 – ORDER

1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444
(9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which
objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no
error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s F&R [34]. Accordingly, Defendant FCA’s
Motion for Summary Judgment [23] is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this

day of

, 2018.

____________________________________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge

2 – ORDER