J-M-C-B et al v. Johnson, et al

Filing 29

ORDER The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation 25 , and therefore, Defendants' motion to dismiss 20 is granted and Plaintiffs' motion to join additional parties 8 is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 8th day of August, 2018, by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (peg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
J-M-C-B; et al,

No. 3:16-cv-02150-AC
Plaintiffs,

v.
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of
Homeland Security, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings & Recommendation (#25) on May 30, 2018,
in which he recommends the Court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss and deny Plaintiff's
motion to join additional plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have timely filed objections to the Findings &
Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings &
Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
1 - ORDER

Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiffs' objections and conclude there is no basis to modify
the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de
novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [25], and
therefore, Defendants' motion to dismiss [20] is granted and Plaintiffs' motion to join additional
parties [8] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

day of

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

, 2018.