Harbord v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Filing
30
Stipulated Order of Dismissal. Signed on 11/28/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
Elizabeth A. Falcone, OSB No. 111694
elizabeth.falcone@ogletree.com
Kelly S. Riggs, OSB No. 094862
kelly.riggs@ogletree.com
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
The KOIN Center
222 SW Columbia Street, Suite 1500
Portland, OR 97201
Telephone:
503.552.2140
Fax:
503.224.4518
Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
DERRICK HARBORD, an individual,
Case No.: 3:16-cv-02179-SI
Plaintiff,
STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC. d.b.a The
Home Depot, a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties hereby stipulate
that this case is dismissed with prejudice, without costs or attorney’ fees to any party and with no
right of appeal.
IS SO ORDERED this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to
any party.
DATED this ____ day of __________, 2017.
28th
November
____________________________________
/s/ Michael H. Simon
Judge Michael H. Simon
1 - STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
The KOIN Center
222 SW Columbia Street, Suite 1500 | Portland, OR 97201
Phone: 503.552.2140 | Fax: 503.224.4518
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
Dated this 27th day of November, 2017
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
By:
s/ Kelly S. Riggs
Kelly S. Riggs, OSB No. 094862
kelly.riggs@ogletree.com
Of Attorneys for Defendant
Dated this 27th day of November, 2017
Case & Dusterhoff, LLP
By:
s/ Steven C. Burke
Steven C. Burke, OSB No. 002198
steve@case-dusterhoff.com
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
2 - STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
The KOIN Center
222 SW Columbia Street, Suite 1500 | Portland, OR 97201
Phone: 503.552.2140 | Fax: 503.224.4518
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?