Snider v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 36

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 29 . Signed on 3/9/2018 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION

VALORIE SNIDER,

Case No. 3: 16-cv-02236-JR
ORDER

Plaintiff,
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

AIKEN, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Jolie Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") on
1/08/2018 (doc. 29) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and
remanded for further proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B)
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any p01tion of a magistrate judge's F&R,
the district court must make a de nova determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's
report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); }vfcDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business lvfachines,
Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Plaintiff filed timely objections to the F&R (doc. 34), and the Commissioner has filed a
response to those objections (doc. 35). Thus, I review the F&R de nova.

PAGEi-ORDER

Having reviewed the record and the F&R de nova, I find no error in Judge Russo's
reasoning.
Thus, I adopt Magistrate Judge Russo's F&R (doc. 29) in its entirety. Accordingly, the
decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings
consistent with the F&R and this order. This case is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this~ day of March, 2018.

AnnAiken
United States District Judge

PAGE2-0RDER