Snider v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 29 . Signed on 3/9/2018 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Case No. 3: 16-cv-02236-JR
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
AIKEN, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Jolie Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") on
1/08/2018 (doc. 29) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and
remanded for further proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B)
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any p01tion of a magistrate judge's F&R,
the district court must make a de nova determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's
report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); }vfcDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business lvfachines,
Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the F&R (doc. 34), and the Commissioner has filed a
response to those objections (doc. 35). Thus, I review the F&R de nova.
Having reviewed the record and the F&R de nova, I find no error in Judge Russo's
Thus, I adopt Magistrate Judge Russo's F&R (doc. 29) in its entirety. Accordingly, the
decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings
consistent with the F&R and this order. This case is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this~ day of March, 2018.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?