Sowden v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion 28 is GRANTED. The agency is directed to issue § 406(b) check directly to plaintiff's counsel, minus any user fee. Any amount withheld after all administrative and attorney fees are paid should be released directly to Plaintiff. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Signed on 10/28/2019 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) Modified on 10/29/2019 (rsm) to add Opinion. Modified on 10/29/2019 (rsm) to correct filing date. Docket entry regenerated to the parties.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
Civ. No. 3:16-cv-02310-CL
JEFF SOWDEN,
Plaintiff,
OPINION & ORDER
V.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
CLARKE, Magistrate Judge.
This case comes before the Court on an unopposed motion for attorney fees (#28) under
42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Plaintiff moves the Court for approval of $9,575.51 in fees, reduced by
$4,383.98 Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") fees already awarded, for a total of $5,191.53.
A fee awarded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) cannot exceed 25% of the retroactive benefits.
Crawfordv. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1147 (9th Cir. 2009). The fee being requested, combined
with the $6,000 agency fee already awarded, is 25% of the retroactive benefits ($62,302.04)
awarded to Plaintiff. Having reviewed the proceedings and the amount of fees sought, the Court
Page I - OPINION & ORDER
concludes that Plaintiffs counsel is entitled to the $9,575.51 in fees requested, minus $4,383.98
EAJA fees, for a total of $5,191.53.
Plaintiffs Motion (#28) is GRANTED. The agency is directed to issue the§ 406(b) check
directly to Plaintiffs counsel, minus any user fee. Any amount withheld after all administrative
and attorney fees are paid should be released directly to Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED AND DATED t h i s ~ day of
United States Magistrate Judge
Page 2 - OPINION & ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?