Shah v. Meier Enterprises, Inc., et al

Filing 97

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings & Recommendation 74 , and therefore, the motion to dismiss by Defendants "MEIER ENTERPRISES DIRECTORS," "MEIER ENTERPRISES OFFERS," and "MEIER ENTERPRISES EMPLOYEE OWNERS," 65 is granted. Signed on 2/13/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jtj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON SHANTUBHAI SHAH, No. 3:17-cv-00226-JE Plaintiff, v. MEIER ENTERPRISES, INC., a Washington Corporation; et al. ORDER Defendants. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings & Recommendation (#74) on December 27, 2017, in which he recommends the Court grant certain Defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th 1 - ORDER Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings & Recommendation [74], and therefore, the motion to dismiss by Defendants "MEIER ENTERPRISES DIRECTORS," "MEIER ENTERPRISES OFFERS," and "MEIER ENTERPRISES EMPLOYEE OWNERS," [65] is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER , 2018.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?