Vida v. Easterday
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 4 . Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice and this Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend. Any amended complaint is due within fourteen days of the date of this Order. Signed on 5/8/17 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (cib) Modified on 5/9/2017. Judge Hernandez signed the order not Judge Acosta (cib).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation (#4) on March 28,
2017, in which he recommends that this Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice. In
addition, he recommends this Court grant Plaintiff leave to amend. The matter is now before me
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, I find no error.
1 - ORDER
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation .
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint  is dismissed without prejudice and this Court grants
Plaintiff leave to amend. Any amended complaint is due within fourteen days of the date of this
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?