Vida v. Carpenter
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acostas Findings & Recommendation 4 . Accordingly, Plaintiffs Complaint (#1) is dismissed without prejudice and the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend. Any amended complaint is due within fourteen days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.DATED this 15th day of June, 2017, by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (peg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge John Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation  on March 30,
2017, in which he recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice.
Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
1 – ORDER
Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings & Recommendation .
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint  is dismissed without prejudice and the Court grants
Plaintiff leave to amend. Any amended complaint is due within fourteen days of the date of this
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?