Carroll v. United States of America
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings & Recommendation 6 . Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss 3 is granted, and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed on 8/2/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jtj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation (#6) on July 12, 2017,
in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's
Complaint. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840
F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's
report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find
1 - ORDER
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings & Recommendation .
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss  is granted, and this action is dismissed without
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?