Oriko v. Public Safety, Portland State University
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 5 . Accordingly, Defendants Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED and this case is dismissed withprejudice. Signed on 9/13/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PUBLIC SAFETY, PORTLAND STATE
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation  on July 12,
2017, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss  and
dismiss this action with prejudice.
Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United
States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
1 – ORDER
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks’s Findings & Recommendation .
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss  is GRANTED and this case is dismissed with
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?