Oriko v. Public Safety, Portland State University

Filing 9

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 5 . Accordingly, Defendants Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED and this case is dismissed withprejudice. Signed on 9/13/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON SHEEBA ORIKO, No. 3:17-cv-00737-JE Plaintiff, ORDER v. PUBLIC SAFETY, PORTLAND STATE UNIVERISTY, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation [5] on July 12, 2017, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [3] and dismiss this action with prejudice. Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. 1 – ORDER Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks’s Findings & Recommendation [5]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [3] is GRANTED and this case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of , 2017. ____________________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge 2 – ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?