Percy et al v. Multnomah County Oregon et al
ORDER: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation 6 . Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 1/12/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pvh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ALBERT E. PERCY and CARL EVANS,
MULTNOMAH COUNTY OREGON,
DEBORAY KAFOURY, JANE DOE, and
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation  on November 29,
2017, in which she recommends that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve Defendants. This matter is now before
me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, I find no error.
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation .
Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
day of January, 2018.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?