Kee v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
33
ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 31 . The Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is Affirmed. Signed on 1/10/19 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
KENNETH K.1,
No. 3:17-cv-01271-JR
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
ORDER
Defendant.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation (#31) on December 19,
2018, in which she recommends that this Court affirm the Commissioner's decision to deny
Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The
matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna1
In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last
name of the non-governmental party or parties in this case.
1 - ORDER
Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840
F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's
report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find
no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings & Recommendation [31].
Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance
benefits and supplemental security income is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
, 2019.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?