Moutal et al v. Exel, Inc.
Filing
22
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation 16 , and therefore, Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' punitive damages allegations 7 is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 4/19/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ERIC MOUTAL and ANDREA
NEWMAN,
No. 3:17-cv-01444-SB
Plaintiffs,
v.
EXEL, INC.,
ORDER
Defendant.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings & Recommendation (#16) on February 2,
2018, in which she recommends the Court deny Defendants' motion to dismiss. Defendant has
timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings &
Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th
1 - ORDER
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Defendant's objections and conclude there is no basis to
modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the
record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [16],
and therefore, Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' punitive damages allegations [7] is
denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
, 2018.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?