Shore v. City of Portland et al

Filing 12

ORDER: For the same reasons explained in the September 29, 2017 Order, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's renewed motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In addition, because Plaintiff's request for relief is denied, the Court also DENIES his request for a preliminary injunction hearing. Signed on 10/5/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JAY VINCENT SHORE,

No. 3:17-cv-1519-YY

Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PORTLAND, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Before the Court is Plaintiff Jay Vincent’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
(“TRO”) [7]. In a September 29, 2017 Order, the Court denied Plaintiff’s prior TRO included in
his Complaint. See Order, Sept. 29, 2017, ECF 6; Compl. ¶¶ 105–109, ECF 2. The Court
concluded that Plaintiff had failed to demonstrate a likelihood of irreparable harm or a
substantial likelihood of success on the merits. Now, Plaintiff reasserts substantially the same
arguments that the Court previously rejected. For the same reasons explained in the September

1- ORDER

29, 2017 Order, the Court denies Plaintiff’s renewed motion for a TRO. In addition, because
Plaintiff’s request for relief is denied, the Court also denies his request for a preliminary
injunction hearing.
CONCLUSION
The Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [7] is denied.
Dated this

day of ______________________, 2017.

Marco A. Hernández
United States District Judge

2- ORDER