W.S. et al v. Molalla River School District

Filing 68

ORDER: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation 63 . Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment 30 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 11/15/2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION

W.S., an individual proceeding under a
pseudonym through his guardian ad litem
BROOKS COOPER; and K.P., an individual
proceeding under a pseudonym through his
guardian ad litem BROOKS COOPER,

No. 3:17-cv-01732-SB
ORDER

Plaintiffs,
v.
MOLLALA RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT,
an Oregon Public School District, authorized
and chartered by the laws of the State of
Oregon,
Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [63] on September
30, 2019, in which she recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s
1 - ORDER

motion for summary judgment. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [63].
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [30] is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

day of ___________________, 2019.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER