Aranda v. United States Forest Service

Filing 25

ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Paul Papak's Findings and Recommendation 16 . Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 13 is Granted. This action is Dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 11/19/18 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ROSALBA PAOLA ORTEGA ARANDA,
et. al.,
Plaintiffs,

No. 3:17-cv-02041-JR

ORDER

v.
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,
Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [16] on September 4,
2018, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[13] and dismiss this action with prejudice. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation.
Pl. Obj., ECF 18. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings &
Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
1 - ORDER

Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes there is no basis
to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions
of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and Recommendation [16].
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [13] is GRANTED. This action is dismissed with
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this _____________ day of _____________________, 2018.

_______________________________________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER