Donovan v. United States of America et al
Filing
3
Order: Plaintiff is able to challenge the disciplinary proceeding and seek a declaration of his rights in his habeas action, and this case is DISMISSED. Signed on 03/06/2018 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (jw)(copy of order mailed to plaintiff)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
JERRY LEE DONOVAN,
Case No. 3:18-cv-00199-JR
ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
RICHARD IVES, Warden,
Defendants.
_____________________________
MCSHANE, District Judge:
Plaintiff, an inmate at Sheridan Federal Correctional Institution, brings this civil rights
action and requests declaratory relief. Plaintiff did not submit the required $350.00 filing fee for
civil rights cases, and an action may proceed without prepayment of the filing fee only upon a
proper application to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
Regardless, plaintiff’s claim must be dismissed. Plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that
his rights to due process were violated during a prison disciplinary hearing that resulted in the
loss of good time credits. It is well established that a challenge to prison disciplinary proceedings
resulting in the deprivation of good-time credits implicates the duration of confinement and must
-1-
ORDER
be raised in a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 487-88
(1973); see also Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 (1997); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539
(1974). In fact, plaintiff has filed a federal habeas petition challenging the disciplinary hearing in
Donovan v. Ives, Case No. 3:18-cv-00198-JR.
Accordingly, plaintiff is able to challenge the disciplinary proceeding and seek a
declaration of his rights in his habeas action, and this case is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
6th
day of March, 2018.
s/ Michael J. McShane
Michael J. McShane
United States District Judge
-2-
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?