Farmer v. Bagla et al

Filing 31

ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 29 . Defendants Bagla's and Fox's Motion to Dismiss 21 is Granted. Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff's claims are brought against Defendant Conlee, they are also Dismissed. For the reasons explained by Judge Papak, the claims are not subject to amendment and thus, are Dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 9/16/18 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
LYNNDA FARMER,

No. 3:18-cv-00504-PK
Plaintiff,

v.
DR. AMAN BAGLA, DR. HEATHER
FOX, and MEGAN CONLEE,

ORDER

Defendants.
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation (#29) on August 3, 2018,
in which he recommends that this Court grant the moving Defendants' motion to dismiss with
prejudice. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840
F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's

1 - ORDER

report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find
no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation [29].
Accordingly, Defendants Bagla's and Fox's motion to dismiss [21] is granted. Additionally, to
the extent Plaintiff's claims are brought against Defendant Conlee, they are also dismissed. For
the reasons explained by Judge Papak, the claims are not subject to amendment and thus, are
dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

day of

, 2018.

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER