Dennis et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Filing 29

Temporary Restraining Order. Plaintiffs and Defendant shall appear before this Court on 8/2/2018 at 11:00AM in Portland Courtroom 15A before Judge Marco A. Hernandez to discuss whether a preliminary injunction should be entered. Signed on 7/26/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DWAYNE J. DENNIS and
HAZEL R.D. DENNIS,
Plaintiffs,

No. 3:18-cv-00555-YY
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER

v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK,
Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Based on the record, including the Amended Complaint [25], motion for temporary
restraining order [27], and supporting exhibits, the Court finds that:
1.

Pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, good cause exists to

issue a temporary restraining order;
2.

If Defendant is not immediately restrained from conducting a foreclosure sale

scheduled for August of 2018, Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm in the form of the loss of
their real property located at 3735 N. Vancouver Ave., Portland, Oregon 97227;
3.

Plaintiffs made good faith efforts to inform Defendant of their intent to seek an

injunction;

1 – TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order
[27], and it is ORDERED that:
4.

Defendant, and those acting on its behalf that receive actual notice of this order,

by personal service or otherwise, are directed as follows:
5.

The foreclosure sale of the real property located at 3735 N. Vancouver Ave.,

Portland, Oregon 97227, shall be halted during the period of time that this temporary restraining
order is in place;
6.

Defendant, and those acting on their behalf are prohibited from either directly or

indirectly taking any actions to advance or conduct the foreclosure sale of the property during the
period of time this temporary restraining order is in place;
7.

Plaintiffs and Defendant shall appear before this Court in Courtroom 15A on

August 2 at 11:00 a.m. to discuss whether a preliminary injunction should be entered granting
the same relief described above in paragraphs 4, 5, and 6, during the pendency of this action;
8.

Plaintiffs are not required to give security in connection with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED this ___________ day of _________________________, 2018.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge

2 – TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER