Bradford v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER: I adopt the F&R 18 in its entirety. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This action is dismissed. Signed on 9/4/2019 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION

JOHNNY RAY B. 1,

Case No. 3:18-cv-00618-MK

ORDER
Plaintiff,
V.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant.
AIKEN, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed his Findings and Recommendation ("F &R")
(doc. 18) recommending that the final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiffs
application benefits be affirmed. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B)
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
When either party objects to any pottion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district comt
must make a de novo detetmination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Co1p. v. Commodore Business lvfachines, Inc., 656 F.2d
1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
1

In the interest of privacy, this order uses only the first name and the initial of the last
name of the non-govetmnental paity or parties in this case.
PAGE I -ORDER

Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the F&R (doc. 20), and the Commissioner has filed
a timely response to those objections (doc. 21 ). Thus, I review the F &R de nova.
Having considered the record and the arguments offered by the parties, I find no error in
Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's opinion.

Thus, I adopt the F&R (doc. 18) in its entirety.

Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This action is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this--t-fl'J.ay o f ~ ~

Ann Aiken
United States District Judge

PAGE 2 -ORDER