Gale v. SAIF Corporation et al
Filing
111
ORDER The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 105 . Therefore, Defendant's Motions to Dismiss 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 96 are GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 16th day of February, 2020 by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pjg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
MICHAEL J. GALE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:18-cv-00707-AC
v.
ORDER
SAIF CORPORATION; MELISSA PIERCE,
Claims Adjuster for SAIF; TIA
LAFONTAINE, Claims Adjuster for SAIF;
BROWN TRANSFER, INC.;
TANASBOURNE PLASTIC SURGERY;
SHELDON R. COBER, M.D.;
PROVIDENCE OCCUPATIONAL
HEALTH HILLSBORO; BEAVERTON
ARMWORKS HAND THERAPY, LLC,
Defendants.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [105] on January 3,
2020, in which he recommends that the Court should grant in part Defendants’ motions to
dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [88]. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the
Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
1 – ORDER
Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that the
objections do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court has
also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate
Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [105].
Therefore, Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss [90, 91, 92, 93, 96] are GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _______________________.
February 16, 2020
________________________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?