Gale v. SAIF Corporation et al

Filing 111

ORDER The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 105 . Therefore, Defendant's Motions to Dismiss 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 96 are GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 16th day of February, 2020 by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pjg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MICHAEL J. GALE, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-00707-AC v. ORDER SAIF CORPORATION; MELISSA PIERCE, Claims Adjuster for SAIF; TIA LAFONTAINE, Claims Adjuster for SAIF; BROWN TRANSFER, INC.; TANASBOURNE PLASTIC SURGERY; SHELDON R. COBER, M.D.; PROVIDENCE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH HILLSBORO; BEAVERTON ARMWORKS HAND THERAPY, LLC, Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [105] on January 3, 2020, in which he recommends that the Court should grant in part Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [88]. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the 1 – ORDER Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that the objections do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [105]. Therefore, Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss [90, 91, 92, 93, 96] are GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: _______________________. February 16, 2020 ________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge 2 – ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?