Anderson et. al v. Multnomah County
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon de novo review, the Court ADOPTS without modification the F&R (ECF 80 ) in full. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 54 ) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 1/27/2025 by Judge Amy M. Baggio. (pvh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
GREGORY H. ANDERSON, an individual, and
YU TE, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 3:20-cv-00555-YY
ORDER
MULTNOMAH COUNTY,
Defendant.
BAGGIO, District Judge:
On October 4, 2024, Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued her Findings and
Recommendation (“F&R”) (ECF 80), that recommended GRANTING Defendant Multnomah
County’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 54) on the First Amendment retaliation claims
asserted by Plaintiff’s Gregory H. Anderson and Yu Te (collectively “Plaintiffs”). 1 The Court has
reviewed de novo the portions Judge You’s F&R to which Plaintiffs’ objected (ECF 92) and adopts
without modification her recommendation.
This Court previously dismissed all claims other than the First Amendment retaliation
claims asserted by Anderson and Te. July 6, 2022, Order (ECF 40).
1
1 – OPINION AND ORDER
II. DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (C). If a party objects, the court “shall make a
de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or
recommendation to which objection is made.” Id. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court is not, however,
required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the
magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v.
Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 433 (9th Cir. 2023). While
the level of scrutiny that the court applies to its F&R review depends on whether a party has filed
objections, the court is free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(C); see also Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.
Upon de novo review, the Court ADOPTS without modification the F&R (ECF 80) in
full. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 54) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27thday of January 2025.
DATED this ____
_______________________
AMY M. BAGGIO
United States District Judge
2 – OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?