G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Marin

Filing 48

ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation 44 . Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 29 is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's 47 U.S.C. § 605 claim and DENIED in all other respe cts. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 35 is GRANTED as to liability associated with its 47 U.S.C. § 553 and trespass to chattel claims, and DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiff's alternate request for Rule 56(d)relief is DENIED as MOOT. Signed on 6/3/2021 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mja)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON G&G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff, No. 3:20-cv-01171-JR ORDER v. ISMAEL LOPEZ MARIN, aka Ismael Lopez, individually, and dba Al Estilo Michoacan Taqueria, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation [44] on May 7, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff and Defendant’s motions for summary judgment. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 - ORDER Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [44]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [29] is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s 47 U.S.C. § 605 claim and DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [35] is GRANTED as to liability associated with its 47 U.S.C. § 553 and trespass to chattel claims, and DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiff’s alternate request for Rule 56(d) relief is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 3, 2021 DATED: __________________________. MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?