Turner et al v. Corporation "X" 1-10
Filing
488
ORDER: Defendant, I-Flow's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 341 ) is Reserved until close of evidence trial. Signed on October 21, 2009 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (cp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CHRISTINA MCCLELLAN, Plaintiff,
Civ. No. 07-1309-AA ORDER
I-FLOW CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants. DONNELL COX; DAVID DOOLITTLE and CAROLYN DOOLITTLE, husband and wife; JUAN A, HUERTA; and KATHERINE FORREST, Plaintiffs, Civ, No. 07-1310-AA ORDER
DJO, LLC, a Delaware corporation, et a l . , Defendants.
AIKEN,
Chief Judge: filed
Plaintiffs
suit
alleging
negligence
and
products
liability arising from the post-operative use of pain pump devices
1
- ORDER
in their shoulder joints. Plaintiffs Christina McClellan and Juan Huerta subsequently amended their complaints to allege punitive damages against defendant I-Flow, Inc. (I-Flow). I-Flow now moves for summary judgment on the punitive damages claims, arguing that neither McClellan nor Huerta presents facts to show that I-Flow consciously and recklessly disregarded a known risk by promoting its pain pump devices far intra-articular uses. Based on the parties1 submissions, I find it questionable whether plaintiffs' claims for punitive damages will survive and be submitted to a jury. Plaintiffs present scant evidence that I-Flow knew of a causal relationship between its pain pumps and
glenohumeral chondrolysis when
plaintiffs
underwent
shoulder
surgeries in 2004, such that I-Flow acted with "reckless and outragecus indifference to a highly unreasonable risk of harm" and with "conscious indifference to the health, safety and welfare of others" by marketing its pain pumps for intra-articular uses. Or.
Rev. Stat.
§
31.730 (1) Andor v. United Air Lines. Inc., 303 Or. ;
505, 517, 739 P.2d 18 (1987) (punitive damages "are a penalty for
conduct that
is
culpable by
reason of
motive,
intent,
or
extraordinary disregard of or indifference to known or highly probable risks to others"). Nonetheless, I decline to grant summary judgment at this time, preferring to resolve the motion after review of all evidence presented at trail.
2
- ORDER
Accordingly, defendant I-Flow's
Judgment (07-1309-AA
doc.
Motions for P a r t i a l Summary
1 0 2 ; 07-1310-AA d o c . 3 4 1 ) a r e RESERVED
u n t i l the close of evidence at trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED t h i s
d a y of October, 2 0 0 9 .
Ann Aiken C h i e f U n i t e d S t a t e s District Judge
3
-
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?