Resendiz-Campos et al v. Alberto Diaz Painting, Inc. et al
Filing
46
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 38 . This action is dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed on 8/1/2011 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (jw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE
SERGIO ANTONIO ROSENDIZ-CAMPOS;)
NOE DIAZ-SAMBRANO,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
)
)
Civil No. 09-6l58-TC
)
)
ALBERTO DIAZ PAINTING, Inc.,
)
ALBERTO DIAZ-SAMBRANO; PLUMMER )
FAMILY HOMEBUILDERS, INC.,
)
BENJAMIN PLUMMER; ROBERT
)
PLUMMER,
)
ORDER
)
Defendants.
)
-------------------------)
Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and
Recommendation on June 10, 2011.
See 28 U.S.C.
ยง
The matter is now before me.
636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b).
objections have been timely filed.
This relieves me of my
obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.
1
- ORDER
No
Lorin
Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).
See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d
452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal principles
de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly,
Recommendation.
prosecution.
DATED this
ADOPT
I
This
Judge
action
/~day
is
Coffins
dismissed
Findings
for
want
of August, 2011.
t Judge
2
- ORDER
and
of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?