Cheeseman v. Garrison

Filing 9

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 3 in its entirety. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim and is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 12/15/09 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (lae)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ROBERT CHEESEMAN, Plaintiff,
v.

)

1
) )

Civil No. 09-6310-TC ORDER

1 1
)

RANDOLPH L. GARRISON,

1 1
Coffin filed Findings and

Defendant.

Magistrate Judge Thomas M.

Recommendation on November 17, 2009, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 636 (b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). When either party objects to any

portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report.
See 28 U.S.C. 5 636(b) (1) ;

McDonnell Douslas Corn. v. Commodore Business Machines. Inc.

,

656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920

1

-

ORDER

Plaintiff has timely filed objections.

I have, therefore,

given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge

Coffinfs Findings and Recommendation filed November 17, 2009, in

its entirety.

Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim and

is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this

/ @day of 6

, 2009.

2

-

ORDER