Meng v. Dutra Group
Filing
49
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 44 ; Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 27 . Signed on 5/21/2012 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (jw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ASHLEY T. MENG,
Plaintiff,
6: 10-cv-6416-TC
v.
ORDER
DUTRA GROUP,
Defendant.
Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and
Recommendation on April 19, 2012.
See 28 U.S.C.
ยง
636 (b) (1) (B)
The matter is now before me.
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b).
objections have been timely filed.
No
This relieves me of my
obligation to give the factual findings
~
novo review.
Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).
See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F. 2d
1
- ORDER
452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal principles
de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly,
Recommendation.
I
ADOPT
Judge
Coffin's
Findings
Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment
(#27) is denied.
DATED this
--~--f--=F----'
United Stat
2
- ORDER
and
2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?