Meng v. Dutra Group

Filing 49

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 44 ; Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 27 . Signed on 5/21/2012 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (jw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ASHLEY T. MENG, Plaintiff, 6: 10-cv-6416-TC v. ORDER DUTRA GROUP, Defendant. Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 19, 2012. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636 (b) (1) (B) The matter is now before me. and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). objections have been timely filed. No This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings ~ novo review. Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F. 2d 1 - ORDER 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, Recommendation. I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment (#27) is denied. DATED this --~--f--=F----' United Stat 2 - ORDER and 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?