Kemp v. City of Springfield et al
Filing
59
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 57 . Motion to Dismiss 46 is denied. Signed on 3/5/2012 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (jw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE
MARK ANDREW KEMP,
Plaintiff,
Civil No. 6:10-cv-6420-TC
v.
ORDER
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, PETER
KIRKPATRICK, in his individual
and official capacities; LANE )
COUNTY; SHERIFF RUSSEL BURGER, )
in his individual and official )
capacities; TERRY FIELDS, in
)
her individual and official
)
capacities; DR. ALAN KOHN, in )
his original and official
)
capacit s; DR. JUDY PISONNEAULT)
in her individual and official )
capacities; HARVEY MARSHAL, in )
his individual and official
)
capacities; MICHAEL MCBRIDE, in)
his individual and official
)
capacities,
)
)
Defendants.
)
------------------------)
1
- ORDER
Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and
Recommendation on January 30, 2012.
me.
See 28 U.S.C.
The matter is now before
636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
ยง
objections have been timely filed.
No
This relieves me of my
obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.
Lorin
700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).
See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d
452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal principles
de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly,
Recommendation.
I
ADOPT
Judge
Coffins
Findings
The motion to dismiss (#46) from defendant City
of Springfield and defendant Kirkpatrick is denied.
DATED this
2
- ORDER
and
d
day of
-!1~/.JI.e;tC;It,.(.c.....
41----'
2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?