Bistrika v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Filing 73

ORDER: Granting Motion to Dismiss 51 for failure to prosecute and for failure to follow a court order. See, formal Order. Signed on 4/18/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. Notice of this Order was mailed to plaintiff, Lidia Bistrika. (rdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON LIDIA G. BISTRIK.A, Plaintiff, No. 6:11-cv-6158-JR v. ORDER COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a private Washington corporation licensed to do business in Oregon, Defendant. AIKEN, District Judge: Pro se plaintiff, Lidia Bistrika, brings this action alleging race and national ongm discrimination and disability discrimination as well as a host of other related state and federal claim. After numerous delays related to state court criminal proceedings and appeals, defendant's 1 - 0 R D E R long-pending motion to dismiss became ripe for a decision. Plaintiff had yet to respond to the motion and, on February 13, 2017, the court ordered plaintiff to file the response by March 15, 2017. Plaintiff failed to respond and, onMarch28, 2017, the court ordered plaintiffto show cause, by April 11, 2017, why the motion to dismiss should not be granted and warned plaintiff that a failure to respond would result in dismissal of this action. To date, plaintiff has not responded. Accordingly, this action is dismissed for the reasons stated in defendant's motion to dismiss (#51 ), for failure to prosecute and for failure to follow a court order. CONCLUSION Defendant's motion to dismiss (#51) is granted and this action is dismissed. DATED this / ~yofApril2017. Ann Aiken United States District Judge 2 - 0 R D E R •

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?