Chambers v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Filing 21

ORDER for Attorney Fees pursuant to EAJA. Signed on 10/04/2012 by Judge James A. Redden. (pvh)

Download PDF
• Drew L. Johnson Kathryn Tassinari rwood@callatg.com kathrynt50@comcast.net 1700 Valley River Drive Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 434-6466 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PATRICIA CHAMBERS, Civil No. 6:11-cv-06198-RE Plaintiff, ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA · VS. MICHAEL J, ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby grants that Commissioner shall pay the sum of $5191.96 and expenses of $19.29 (Service costs), for a total of $5211.25, upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff, _ U.S._, 130 S. Ct. 2521,2527 (2010) (EAJA awards fees subject "to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal debts") for full settlement of all claims for fees 1 -ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA • under BAJA. Court filing-fees shall be awarded to Plaintiff attorney in the sum of $350.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1920. If Plaintiff has no outstanding federal debt, payment of $521!.25 plus $350.00 reimbursement of Court filing-fees shall be made to Plaintiff's attorney and mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel's office at the address provided above. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of October ,jr , 2012 U.s/District Judge PRESENTED BY: By: / // /s/ DREW L. JOHNSON Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 2- ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?