United States of America v. Berst

Filing 13

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 7 . Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 4 ; Signed on 3/16/12 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (sln)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,
6:11-cv-6370-TC

v.
ORDER
TRUMAN J. BERST, an individual
d/b/a ALTERNATIVE HEALTH &
HERBS REMEDIES,
Defendant.
Magistrate

Judge

Thomas

M.

Coffin

filed

Findings

Recommendation on January 31, 2012, in the above enti

and

ed case.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B)
and Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

72(b).

When either party objects to any

portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendat
district court must make a de novo determination of that
of the magistrate judge's report.
1

ORDER

on

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1);

McDonnell Douglas Corp.

v.

Commodore Business Machines,

656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981),

455

Inc.,

u.s.

920

(1982) .
Pla
given

I have, therefore,

novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.
I

Cof

iff has timely filed objections.

f

no error.

Accordingly,

I ADOPT Magistrate Judge

's Findings and Recommendation fil

its entirety.

January 31, 2012, in

Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED

s

Ib'o/

/

2

- ORDER

day of

--~~~~~~----~-----

, 2012.