Amanti v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Filing 20

ORDER. Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorneys fees in the amount of $4,882.32 shall be awarded to plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. In addition, plaintiff is awarded $350.00 in costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. The parties agree that attorney fees and costs will be paid to plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program. See Astrue v. Ratliff, ___U.S.___, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). If plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to plaintiff's attorney and mailed to plaintiff's attorney's office. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 02/13/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T.HE DISTRICT OF OREGON 6: 11-cv-06378-MA AMANDA N. AMANTI, Plaintiff, ORDER v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MARSH, Judge Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorneys fees in the amount of $4,882.32 shall be awarded to plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412. In addition, plaintiff is awarded $350.00 in costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. costs § will § 1920. be paid The parties agree that attorney fees and to plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program. See Astrue v. Ratliff, Ill Ill 1 - ORDER u.s. , 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to plaintiff's attorney and mailed to plaintiff's attorney's office. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ~day of February, 2013. Malcolm F. Marsh United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?