Corrinet v. Burke et al
Filing
30
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 28 ; Granting Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction 7 without prejudice to refile the complaint in the appropriate venue. Signed on 5/30/2012 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (jw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MARK STEVEN CORRINET,
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
)
) 6: 11-cv-6416-TC
)
)
RUSTY BURKE, PAUL HERMAN, BILL )
CAVALIER, PATRICE LOUINET,
)
FREDRIK MALMBERG, ROB ROEHM and)
GLENN LORD, as individuals and )
the ROBERT E. HOWARD FOUNDATION)
INC., as a Texas corporation
)
and DOES 1-25 inclusive,
)
ORDER
)
Defendants.
)
Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and
Recommendation on April 30, 2012.
See 28 U.S.C.
ยง
636 (b) (1) (B)
The matter is now before me.
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b).
objections have been timely filed.
This relieves me of my
obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.
1
- ORDER
No
Lorin
Corp.
y.
Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).
See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d
452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal principles
de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly,
Recommendation.
I
ADOPT
Judge
Coffin's
Findings
and
The motion to dismiss (#7) for lack of personal
jurisdiction without prejudice to refile the complaint in the
appropriate venue is granted.
DATED this
,.st)~day
of
--~---7-'-J'-----'
2012.
e't 1 ,
Un' ted States
2
- ORDER
Dist~u
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?