Patrick v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation 18 of Magistrate Judge Hubel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 05/15/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
6:11-cv-06427-HU

JAMES E. PATRICK,

ORDER

Plaintiff,

v.
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
fvlARSH, Judge
Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation
on JVlarch 1,

( #18)

2013.

Judge Hubel recommended that the Social

Security Commissioner's decision be affirmed.
before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§

The matter is now

636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P.

72 (b).

Plaintiff filed timely objections (#22), essentially renewing
arguments presented in his briefing to Judge Hubel.
to

objects

any

Recommendation,

portion
the

of

district

the

Magistrate's

court

must

make

When a party
Findings
de

a

determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report.
U.S.C.

§

1 - ORDER

636(b) (1) (B);

McDonnell

Douglas

Corp.

v.

and

novo
See 28

Commodore

Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert.
denied,
930,

455 U.S.

932

920

(1982); accord Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d

1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane).
Therefore,

I

have given the file of this case a

de novo

review and have also carefully evaluated the Judge Hubel's Findings
and Recommendation, petitioner's objections, and the record of the
case.
and

I find that the Findings and Recommendation is well-reasoned
without

error.

Accordingly,

I

ADOPT

the

Findings

and

Recommendation (#18) of Magistrate Judge Hubel.
IT IS SO ORDERED .

.-

DATED this~ day of May, 2013.

Malcolm F. Marsh
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER