United States of America v. Lund et al

Filing 57

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 52 . Denying Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction 34 ; Signed on 10/3/12 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (sln)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
No.

6:12-cv-62-TC

v.

ORDER
ROBERT A. LUND and COLLEEN L.
LUND,
Defendants.

Magistrate

Judge

Findings

and

Recommendation on August 31, 2012, in the above entitled case.

The

matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B)

and

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Thomas

M.

Coffin

filed

No objections have been timely filed.

This

relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo
review.
Cir.
708

1

Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th

1982).
F.

See also Britt v.

2d 452,

454

- ORDER

(9th Cir.

Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,
1983).

Having

reviewed the

legal

principles de novo,

I find no error.

Accordingly,

I adopt Judge

Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION
I adopt Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation
(#52)

filed August 31, 2012.

Defendants' motion to dismiss

(#34)

is denied.

DATED this

2

- ORDER

....S~ay ----la~~=~·-----'
of

2012.