Rigor v. Freemont Investment and Loan et al

Filing 20

ORDER: USDC Case No. 6:11-cv-6332-HO is hereby DISMISSED as redundant. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [#5; #10] are DENIED as moot. Signed on 8/23/12 by U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan. (sln)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DIVISION
ANNE L. RIGOR,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 6:12-CV-00573-HO
ORDER

FREMONT INVESTMENT and LOAN;
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
INC.; JP MORGAN MORTGAGE
ACQUISITION CORP.; JP MORGAN
ACCEPTANCE CORP.; US BANK, NA,
TRUSTEE FOR JP MORGAN MORTGAGE
ACQUISITION CORP.; NORTHWEST
TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC.; and
JOHN DOES 1-10,
Defendants.

The parties were ordered to show cause in writing why USDC
Case No. 6:11-cv-6332-HO, Rigor v. Fremont Investment et al,
should not be dismissed as redundant.

1 - ORDER

Defendants have responded

that they do not oppose the dismissal.

[#18].

To date plaintiff

has not responded.
Defendants were also ordered to show cause why their Motions
to Dismiss [#5; #10] should not therefore be dismissed as moot.
[#16]. Defendants agree that, with the dismissal of Case No. 116332-HO, their Motions to Dismiss [#5; #10] are moot.

[#18 J •

Conclusion
USDC Case No. 6:11-cv-6332-HO is hereby DISMISSED as
redundant.

Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [#5; #10] are DENIED

as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED
DATED this

·z..~~~
~~day
/

2 - ORDER

of August, 2012.